Saturday, March 17, 2012

"I am not God, I am Sachin, please keep me away from this number Game !"


When Sachin R. tendulkar was asked about his feelings after completing his 100th century, the God of the cricket gave a really thought provoking reply.
He said that since it was taking a long time to complete his 100th 100 after his last (99th) hundrerd, so during this time he has seen so much hussle for his next century thanks to the media hype. He said that he had seen the concern for his next century in the eyes of everyone including all the house keeping people of the restaurants where he visited. He said that "No one was talking about the 99 hundreds I had scored, everyone just spoke about the 100th hundred".
This is really thought provoking. World salutes those who excel or those who finishes a great feat. No one remembers for long "nearly complete" tasks. No one worships a rising moon (except on Karwa Chauth). Making 99 centuries in itself is a record. But just the addition of one to this number would make something extra ordinary. Ofcourse it created a mental pressure on Sachin and thats the reason it took him so long to complete this task. But his astonishment around this topic is quite debatable and it again shows the humbleness of this great personality.
This incident reminds me of my all time favorite film "Jo Jeeta Wahi Sikander", in which the father of the main protagonist says that no matter how well you perform till the end, what matters is that whether you actually did it or not, whether you won or not ?
For a batsman who has been playing so well for so long, another hundred should not be a big thing, but since this one hundred would make the count to "100", it created so much mental pressure on him. As per Sachin's thoughts, its not that important and the true patriot said that "It doesnt matter how many hundreds you score, you still have to put your head down and do your job for your team." Number system is after all created by human beings. Surprisingly, no one would take a 101st century as a big deal, though 101 is one more than 100.....
Strange thing, right ?

Friday, February 3, 2012

A Token of thanks

I had to mute the speaker. She might hear the sound of opening windows on my laptop. I have to type slowly as she should not hear the sound of keys. She is sleeping with her face on my lap holding my hand. I am typing with my left hand.
Why so much show off ?
Why should I have to sit uncomfortably and type all this ?
As compared to whatever she does for me, it behoves me to do atleast this little for her. She listens to all my harsh speeches, tolerates every bit of me, stands by me for my dreams and works hard for our better future.

As I write this, I realize that God gives us so much in the form of relations. He gives us loving parents, like-minded siblings, understanding friends, soul mate spouse, even then we all crib...
Sometimes its better to take sometime off from cribbing and thank those who suffer for us.. thats I am doing right now...

Wednesday, January 11, 2012

Chanakya: part II- Tweaking of history with noble intentions

Chanakya is a story of Magadha, the then existing Patna in Bihar. The great king Mahapadam Nanada of Nanda dynasty ruled the Magadha empire and Pataliputra was its capital. This kingdom was vast and very strong. So strong to fear away the soldiers of Alexander who has penetrated deep in the then existing Indian Subcontinent.


The administration of Pataliputra under the Nanda rule, consisted of a council of ministers, the prime minister, the senapati (commander-in-chief) and a special position of Amatya; who sometime acts a chief advisor of the king and sometimes as the principal administrative head under the king.

Though very little is known about the story of Chanakya, various sources confirm this flow: Chanakya a.k.a. Vishnugupta was a Brahmin and a learned scholar and acharya of Taxila, a great university of that time, and Chanakya was thrown out of the Magadha court after being insulted by the king Dhana Nanda, the son of Mahapadam Nanda. Infuriated Vishnugupta swore revenge and later he helped a brave man named Chandragupta Maurya to overthrow the Nanda dynasty and established him as the ruler of Magadha.

The serial has expanded to this basic story by telling that Dhana Nanda was an unjust and corrupt ruler (which most historic sources agree with). The chief minister of Dhana Nanda rebels against him and is imprisoned. Then an acharya Chanak, a friend of the minister, rebels against the king and he too is imprisoned and later dies in cell. Vishnu Gupta is the son of Chanak, who leaves Pataliputra and reaches Taxila where he learns Vedas by heart and becomes a great acharya himself in Taxila.

It was a time of the invasion by Alexander the great in India. Taxila was the northwestern frontier of the then existing Indian subcontinent and the security of all Indian kingdoms were dependent on the protection provided by Taxila. But the ambitious king of Taxila forms alliance with Alexander and opens the gates of India for him. Vishnu Gupta Chanakya was annoyed by the ideologies of the then existing small kingdoms in the Indian Subcontinent (which were called janapadas) which was limited to safeguarding their own boundaries. Disregarding his hatred he begs help to Magadha king Dhana Nanda and his ministers and asks them to lead the forces against the Greek incumbent forces, but affluent with his position, king Dhana Nanda insults Chanakya and throws him out of his court.

A furious Chanakya vows revenge and opens his shikha (hair), an act which was consider unworthy for a Brahmin, and swears that unless he uproots the Nanda king and all those who will be hurdle in establishment of a united and fortified India, he will not tie his hair.

Vishnu Gupta takes with him to Taxila, a cowherd boy Chandragupta from Pataliputra after watching possibilities of him in becoming a king. He teaches Chandragupta and several other Brahmins about the national integrity and sovereignty.

Meanwhile after defeating many kingdoms in India Alexander defeats mountain king of Kekaya, Parvateshwar, popularly known as Porus. Porus accepts the friendship of Alexander which only turns out to be a slavery of his men when he has left India. Alexander’s forces tired of fighting and fearing of encountering another huge force similar to that of Porus again in India, refuse to march ahead and Alexander had to return and he appoints his chieftains, known as satrap, in the provinces he has won.

Chandragupta and Chanakya’s mission starts after Alexander’s departure. With the help of growing rebels Chanakya compels king of Taxila to help him and he forms a small army under the leadership of Chandragupta. Chanakya’s strategies led to the assassination of the satrap of Alexander and after the death of Alexander in Greece, Chandragupta leads a force and frees all the kingdoms previously won by Alexander. With the help of the his long time friend and minister in Kekaya, Chanakya makes king Porus an ally of Chandragupta and under the alliance, many kingdoms of Northern mountain countries come under the leadership of Chandragupta and with the advice of Chanakya, Chandragupta marches with that army towards Magadha to overthrow the Nanda king.

But Magadha was not an easy target. With exceptional military strategies, spy networks, dedicated loyal army chieftans, an honest prime minister and the ever watchful Amatya Kartikeya, popularly known as Amatya Rakshasa, it was not possible to uproot Magadha. But Chanakya returns to Pataliputra with a plan. He exploits the deep rooted corruption in the system led by the aging and retiring king Dhana Nanda, corrupt Commander-in-chief and jealous princes. He creates a situation of civil war and the sons of the king and the commander is killed and king has to leave the city. Amatya Rakshasa goes in hiding seeking plot to revenge the downfall of Nanda dynasty.

When Chandragupta enters Pataliputra, he faces no opposition. Chanakya is appointed as new amatya and he appoints to the council all those loyal to Magadha. Meanwhile, the supporter kings of Chandragupta want a share of either kingdom or wealth of Magadha. Chief among them is Laghu Paurav, the nephew of king Porus. Paurav is looking for a way to remove Chandragupta to become sole ruler of Magadha. For this, he takes help of amatya Rakshasa who is living in hiding. But Chanaky plays above all of them. He, with his guile and techniques, kills all the enemies of Chandragupta and compels amatya Rakshasa to surrender before him. When he does so, Chankaya humbly appoints him the amatya of Chandragupta and thus King Chandragupta is crowned as ruler of Magadha.

Now the serial does tweak a lot with the historical information that we know. But since most of the information about that period is either ambiguous or unconfirmed so it does no harm in accepting Dr. Dwivedi’s version. There are many differences.

The most startling difference is the mentality of unity of Indian subcontinent by Vishnu Gupta which does not seem possible at that time because the concept of Indian subcontinent and something known as “Maa Bharati” was not known at that time. Chanakya’s motives as the historians put it, was to overthrow Nanda king. But the serial shows hiss motive of united and protected India, which is very soothing.

Another difference is that Chandragupta is mentioned as a cowherd boy and not a Kshatriya. Most sources say that Chandragupta was a Kshatriya and was dissatisfied with Nanda king.

Perhaps the greatest difference is the overthrowing of Nanda. The historical sources say that Chandragupta does fight series of wars in guerilla techniques with the Nanda army and Chanakya’s initial attempt to defeat Nanda failed and then he changed his strategies by weakening enemy at around its edges. In the serial, however, Dhana Nanda’s empire is brought down in just one night by a series of activities happening outside the king’s palace which are actually result of Chanakya’s strategies. Infact Chandragupta did not fight at all with the Nanda king or his army. Rather it is shown that the army starts the civil war as it gets divided between the supporters of the commander-in-chief Bhadrashaal (beautifully portrayed by Irrfan Khan) and army chief Balabhadra (played by Narendra Suri).

Another difference is related to an old Sanskrit play “Mudra Rakshasa”. The later episodes of Chanakya which tells the story of post-Nanda is based on this play where Chanakya tries to win over the equally intelligent amatya Rakshasa who is living in hiding and seeking plot for revenge. According to the play, Rakshasa sends a poison damsel popularly known as Visha kanya to Chandragupta to kill him but Chanakya makes her kill Paurav king who was anyway a hurdle in Chandragupta’s ascending to throne. In the TV serial it is shown that Rakshasa does send a dancer played by Neena Gupta to kill Chandragupta as part of a plan formed by amatya Rakshasa and laghu Paurav. But before the dancer could kill Chandragupta, Chanakya reveals that laghu Paurava was already under his watchful eyes through spy networks and then Paurava is murdered and the dancer is sent back.

The story of the serial is gripping followed by excellent performances by lead actors. I would particularly quote the performance of Dr. Dwivedi as exceptional and a result of immense hard work. His silent glances, movements, walking style makes him a perfect Vishnu Gupt. Equally commendable performance was by veteran actor Surendra Pal, popularly known for his portrayals of Dronacharya in Mahabharata, Kilvish in Shaktimaan and Vikranta Jabbaar in ZEE horror show. Surendra Pal’s personality, tall figure, deep voice and very expressive face made the character of amatya Rakshasa loveable.

Also the producer of the serial, Prakash Dwivedi played two roles in the serial. One was Jeevasiddhi, Buddhist monk and another was of the wicked laghu Paurav. The latter was an awesome portrayal.

Popular actors Irrfan Khan, Sanjay Mishra, Manoj Joshi, Deepraj Rana, Sooraj Chaddha played important roles in the serial.




The flow of the serial was however flawed. I read over internet that there was some controversy over the serial and channel was not giving extension for further episodes so Dr. Dwivedi completed the serial in a hurry, it seems. The later episodes based on Mudra rakshasa does not gel well with the former episodes. Most importantly the serial doesnot show whether Vishnu Gupt was able to fulfill his vow.

But if these flaws can be ignored, the television serial is worth watching and the one thing that we learn from producers and directors of that age is that for providing good knowledge and imparting values, even if we have to tweak with history or to add items from our own side for non existing pieces or to club some historical facts, then its not only Ok but quite commendable work.

Tuesday, January 10, 2012

Chanakya: part-I: Impact of advent of religious sects on society and Lifestyle of Teachers

 
“Chanakya” tells the story of the period when old Vedic culture was dying. The ancient Varna system was getting exploited. The Brahmanas were involved in more activities than asking for alms and teaching, Kshatriyas who were supposed to safeguard the lands and people were getting involved in their own selfish malpractices guided by guile, greed, vengeance, etc,., Vaishyas were downgrading themselves to any level for making profits, Shudras no longer were ready to tolerate the dominance of other races and were ready to claim their rights. The serial and the historical story itself tells the events that led to a cowherd boy Chandragupta to ascend the throne of the kingdom.


The interesting and creative perspective that the serial showed was that the advent of religion was one of the prime reasons for this upheaval. It showed the time period after the preachings of Buddha (“Tathagat” in serial) and Mahavira. It showed the ever present mentality of people that they DO always need a God and a religion to believe in. With growing disbelief in Vedic culture, people were really looking for alternative ways to lead life. The teachings of Buddha and Mahavira provided the grounds and religions were formed. Some started following Buddhism and some Jainism. Interesting thing is that the creation of these sects resulted in segmentation of the society and things started turning sour when the administration and the king started using the divide-and-rule policy. The favoring of one sect and disregarding other started.

Interestingly, this led to a major change in the lifestyle of the teachers. Teachers who were initially living on alms provided by the students had to strive because of the differences in treatments the students used to face while asking for alms. The changes in Vedic culture which included transgressing others code of life led the teachers to ask money for education ! This came as a shock for the main protagonist acharya Vishnugupta who till now belived in old traditional ways for teachers…

We find a stark contrast here when we compare this fact with the teachings of Mahabharata where the acharyas like Drona and Kripa did get benefits and money for teachings. But there is a huge difference. Mahabharata mentions several teachers like Parashurama, Bheeshma, Drona, Kripa. Among them it was only Drona who can be blamed for giving education in return for favors (if not blamed for other things like Eklavya, Karna, etc). Kripa was a royal priest so was bound to teach princes and receive royal reimbursements. But being a huge fan of Mahabharata and particularly Acharya Drona, I can say that it was the other way round for Drona. The elders like Bheeshma asked Drona to teach and money and favors were not given in return of that education but as a token of help to a poor but an able warrior Brahmana. Moreover the acharyas mentioned in Mahabharata were to teach the princes and teachers and Acharyas shown in Chanakya were to teach all rich poor, mainly Brahmin boys.

Coming back to the story of “Chanakya”, the teachers who started asking for material benefits in return of education were termed as “Upadhyas”; often referred to as professional teachers.